So each day I practice a different tactic. So my tactics training regimen is like this (Chess Tempo)
Day 1:
5 problems - (standard) specific tactical motif (i.e. discovered attack, sacrifice, fork/double attack, etc)
5 problems - blitz
5 problems - mixed
Day 2:
5 problems - (standard) specific mate type
5 problems - "problems I've gotten wrong at least once"
5 problems - standard
And I alternate everyday doing that. I keep a log to record how well I am doing. If over three consecutive runs of the same tactic, I end up scoring a 13 (out of 15) or better, I will up the difficulty by 200 points (right now I have all the specific tactic-type sets limited to 1400-1700). My Chess Tempo standard tactics rating is around 1600.
Right now, I am not even done with one round, but so far I have this:
Advanced Pawn 5
Attraction 3 Avoiding Perpetual 2
Avoiding Stalemate 3
Back Rank Mate 3
Blocking 4
Capturing Defender 2
Clearance 2
Coercion 3
Counting 3
Defensive Move 1
Desperado 3
Discovered Attack 3
Distraction 4
Double Check 2
Exposed King 4
Mate - Anastasia's 3
Mate - Balestra's 1
Mate - Arabian 5
Mate - Backburne's 5
Mate - Boden's 4
Mate - Damiano's 5
Mate - Damiano's Bishop 4
Mate - Double Bishop 5
Mate - Dovetail 4
Mate - Dovetail - Bishop 4
Mate - Epaulette 3
Mate - Escalator 3
Mate - Greco's 3
What can you deduce from my performance in various tactics types, in terms of my strengths and weaknesses as a player (tactically)?