2

So each day I practice a different tactic. So my tactics training regimen is like this (Chess Tempo)

Day 1:

5 problems - (standard) specific tactical motif (i.e. discovered attack, sacrifice, fork/double attack, etc)

5 problems - blitz

5 problems - mixed

Day 2:

5 problems - (standard) specific mate type

5 problems - "problems I've gotten wrong at least once"

5 problems - standard

And I alternate everyday doing that. I keep a log to record how well I am doing. If over three consecutive runs of the same tactic, I end up scoring a 13 (out of 15) or better, I will up the difficulty by 200 points (right now I have all the specific tactic-type sets limited to 1400-1700). My Chess Tempo standard tactics rating is around 1600.

Right now, I am not even done with one round, but so far I have this:

Advanced Pawn 5

Attraction 3 Avoiding Perpetual 2

Avoiding Stalemate 3

Back Rank Mate 3

Blocking 4

Capturing Defender 2

Clearance 2

Coercion 3

Counting 3

Defensive Move 1

Desperado 3

Discovered Attack 3

Distraction 4

Double Check 2

Exposed King 4

Mate - Anastasia's 3

Mate - Balestra's 1

Mate - Arabian 5

Mate - Backburne's 5

Mate - Boden's 4

Mate - Damiano's 5

Mate - Damiano's Bishop 4

Mate - Double Bishop 5

Mate - Dovetail 4

Mate - Dovetail - Bishop 4

Mate - Epaulette 3

Mate - Escalator 3

Mate - Greco's 3

What can you deduce from my performance in various tactics types, in terms of my strengths and weaknesses as a player (tactically)?

  • 6
    Not much. Keep working on the things you're less good at. – dfan Aug 21 '15 at 23:53
  • 7
    I deduce that you tend to overthink things ... – BlindKungFuMaster Aug 24 '15 at 12:14
  • lol @BlindKungFuMaster I've been told this so much in the context of dating from various people online and in real life. I really do. I thought I would be overthinking things in chess. lol now someone is even calling me out for overthinking in chess...lol...what am I? What exactly indicates that I overthink things from this post? I overthink, mainly because I feel I have to to survive. – R3dder Aug 25 '15 at 1:37
  • @R3dder Pick up the book 'Think and Grow Rich' by Napoleon Hill - it will eliminate it. – Jossie Calderon May 11 '17 at 19:20
  • Nothing as you meant the question. And your approach to learning is poor. – edwina oliver 11 hours ago
2

Chess tactics frame different positions which we sometimes come across the Board . It may be Double attack , fork , Pin and many others . Just solving the Chess tactics lone is never the measurement because when you solve a tactic you know already that there is a sacrificial or a combinational move which will make you win or help to solve the tactic . In real games sometimes you even get an easy position but you fail to find the best move OTB .

Solving tactics just make you at ease that you are doing something and practicing Chess but it is never the complete homework to make the best judgement .

A different way to find the performance measurement is that how good you are making a calculation or even finding your own weaknesses in specific patterns . like for an example you have a habit of leaving your piece hanging in your own games . So you must solve tactics relating to Hanging pieces which will help to improve your weak point . They say in whichever tactic you find it difficult to solve you have a weakness in that area .

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.