Timeline for What is the theoretical limit for the number of consecutive checks?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2021 at 3:47 | history | edited | Rewan Demontay | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Grammar
|
| Feb 5, 2021 at 20:45 | history | edited | Rewan Demontay | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 55 characters in body
|
| Apr 8, 2019 at 18:01 | comment | added | Peter | 54 half-moves is far more than I would have expected. It is unlikely that it can be broken. Moreover the other answers deal with pieces that do not exist in chess and one answered missed that neither the fifty-move rule plays a role nor it is not sufficient that ONE side gives checks (which would make the question utterly trivial). | |
| Apr 8, 2019 at 17:21 | vote | accept | Peter | ||
| Apr 8, 2019 at 17:21 | vote | accept | Peter | ||
| Apr 8, 2019 at 17:21 | |||||
| Apr 8, 2019 at 17:19 | vote | accept | Peter | ||
| Apr 8, 2019 at 17:21 | |||||
| Apr 7, 2019 at 3:35 | history | protected | Ellie | ||
| Apr 7, 2019 at 1:02 | answer | added | Rewan Demontay | timeline score: 12 | |
| Dec 18, 2018 at 21:28 | history | edited | Wais Kamal | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 75 characters in body
|
| Sep 29, 2016 at 8:04 | comment | added | Eiko | hebdenbridgechessclub.co.uk/category/problems-and-compositions gives a legal position (with promotion, though) with a sequence of 53 moves. It's not a proof, but given the effort that has gone into it, I'd say there is some hard limit (i.e. no infinite cycle). | |
| Sep 27, 2016 at 7:55 | answer | added | Rosie F | timeline score: 10 | |
| Sep 26, 2016 at 10:29 | answer | added | Sir Cornflakes | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 25, 2016 at 17:40 | answer | added | alphacapture | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 22, 2015 at 7:43 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackChess/status/634994211885072384 | ||
| S Apr 1, 2015 at 11:44 | history | suggested | Stephen |
Added a tag.
|
|
| Apr 1, 2015 at 11:43 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 1, 2015 at 11:44 | |||||
| Apr 1, 2015 at 10:59 | history | edited | Peter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body
|
| Apr 1, 2015 at 10:54 | history | asked | Peter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |