Timeline for Is there a mate-in-three position where the two first moves of the winning side must be quiet to not delay the mate?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15 at 7:48 | history | edited | Hauke Reddmann | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
studies added
|
| Oct 15 at 7:31 | history | edited | Hauke Reddmann | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
higher record
|
| Oct 14 at 7:46 | comment | added | Hauke Reddmann | at everyone: since there is considerable interest, I take it to the experts at MatPlus. I'll edit my answer accordingly. | |
| Oct 14 at 7:44 | history | edited | Hauke Reddmann | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
on request
|
| Oct 13 at 19:33 | comment | added | bof | Without the pawn White has a checkless mate in 7. Is there a mate in 7 or less that incudes a check? | |
| S Oct 13 at 18:29 | history | edited | SecretAgentMan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Oct 13 at 17:42 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 13 at 18:29 | |||||
| Oct 13 at 17:34 | comment | added | Hauke Reddmann | This then would be an unexpected-mate-study. I know tons of them too (and just would have to check that they don't check - sorry :-) - or capture.). | |
| Oct 13 at 17:31 | history | edited | SecretAgentMan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 31 characters in body
|
| Oct 13 at 17:25 | vote | accept | FxMySz | ||
| Oct 13 at 17:25 | comment | added | FxMySz | Oh, it is not as complicated as I thought it would be! Do you think it would be tricky if we only allowed mate-in-three positions where all non-"quiet" non-checkmate white moves make white lose the win? Anyway, great answer! Thank you! | |
| Oct 13 at 17:15 | history | answered | Hauke Reddmann | CC BY-SA 4.0 |