Skip to main content
updated known records
Source Link
Hauke Reddmann
  • 17.3k
  • 3
  • 32
  • 73

This is the "opposite" of A mobility puzzle - I held it back because it could have interfered with Schwalbe 2021 construction challenge.

Thus: Put a maximal number m of pieces on the board such that the position is legal, no obviously promoted pieces occur (I will be gracious with retro-forced promotions) and each piece has exactly n legal moves (obviously 0<=n<=8).

Remarks:

  • n=0: solution is well known, m=30 is possible.
  • n=1,2: My m=32 can't be beat, try to find it.
  • n=3: This is the "king discipline". Even Rewan will get a headache! (And since I can only accept one answer, I'll prefer to accept that record.)
  • n=4: Note you can't just pile up 16 promotable pawns on both-)sides as the position would be illegal!
  • n=5,6,7: My m=16 can't be beat (pawns can't occur), try to find it.
  • n=8: This is the other "king discipline". Promotable pawns with a capture object can occur!
  • n>8 is impossible - the kings.

Thus I suggest that you try m=3,4,8 first (I will not reveal my m there).

EDIT: Here is an update.

5

[FEN "4rq2/rk2Nn2/6NQ/6nR/8/B7/b5K1/1Bb3R1 w KQkq - 0 1"]

6

[FEN "8/3KNN2/6n1/6n1/RBb3k1/1r1B4/q1Rb4/1Q1r4 w KQkq - 0 1"]

7

[FEN "1r5q/7r/1k3N1b/5N1B/b1n5/B1n3K1/R7/Q5R1 w KQkq - 0 1"]

This is the "opposite" of A mobility puzzle - I held it back because it could have interfered with Schwalbe 2021 construction challenge.

Thus: Put a maximal number m of pieces on the board such that the position is legal, no obviously promoted pieces occur (I will be gracious with retro-forced promotions) and each piece has exactly n legal moves (obviously 0<=n<=8).

Remarks:

  • n=0: solution is well known, m=30 is possible.
  • n=1,2: My m=32 can't be beat, try to find it.
  • n=3: This is the "king discipline". Even Rewan will get a headache! (And since I can only accept one answer, I'll prefer to accept that record.)
  • n=4: Note you can't just pile up 16 promotable pawns on both-)sides as the position would be illegal!
  • n=5,6,7: My m=16 can't be beat (pawns can't occur), try to find it.
  • n=8: This is the other "king discipline". Promotable pawns with a capture object can occur!
  • n>8 is impossible - the kings.

Thus I suggest that you try m=3,4,8 first (I will not reveal my m there).

This is the "opposite" of A mobility puzzle - I held it back because it could have interfered with Schwalbe 2021 construction challenge.

Thus: Put a maximal number m of pieces on the board such that the position is legal, no obviously promoted pieces occur (I will be gracious with retro-forced promotions) and each piece has exactly n legal moves (obviously 0<=n<=8).

Remarks:

  • n=0: solution is well known, m=30 is possible.
  • n=1,2: My m=32 can't be beat, try to find it.
  • n=3: This is the "king discipline". Even Rewan will get a headache! (And since I can only accept one answer, I'll prefer to accept that record.)
  • n=4: Note you can't just pile up 16 promotable pawns on both-)sides as the position would be illegal!
  • n=5,6,7: My m=16 can't be beat (pawns can't occur), try to find it.
  • n=8: This is the other "king discipline". Promotable pawns with a capture object can occur!
  • n>8 is impossible - the kings.

Thus I suggest that you try m=3,4,8 first (I will not reveal my m there).

EDIT: Here is an update.

5

[FEN "4rq2/rk2Nn2/6NQ/6nR/8/B7/b5K1/1Bb3R1 w KQkq - 0 1"]

6

[FEN "8/3KNN2/6n1/6n1/RBb3k1/1r1B4/q1Rb4/1Q1r4 w KQkq - 0 1"]

7

[FEN "1r5q/7r/1k3N1b/5N1B/b1n5/B1n3K1/R7/Q5R1 w KQkq - 0 1"]
edited tags; edited tags
Link
Rewan Demontay
  • 17.8k
  • 4
  • 69
  • 116
Self correction ;)
Source Link
Rewan Demontay
  • 17.8k
  • 4
  • 69
  • 116

This is the "opposite" of A mobility puzzle - I held it back because it could have interfered with Schwalbe 2021 construction challenge.

Thus: Put a maximal number m of pieces on the board such that the position is legal, no obviously promoted pieces occur (I will be gracious with retro-forced promotions) and each piece has exactly n legal moves (obviously 0<=n<=8).

Remarks:

  • n=0: solution is well known, m=30 is possible.
  • n=1,2: My m=32 can't be beat, try to find it.
  • n=3: This is the "king discipline". Even RowanRewan will get a headache! (And since I can only accept one answer, I'll prefer to accept that record.)
  • n=4: Note you can't just pile up 16 promotable pawns on both sides-)sides as the position would be illegal!
  • n=5,6,7: My m=16 can't be beat (pawns can't occur), try to find it.
  • n=8: This is the other "king discipline". Promotable pawns with a capture object can occur!
  • n>8 is impossible - the kings.

Thus I suggest that you try m=3,4,8 first (I will not reveal my m there).

This is the "opposite" of A mobility puzzle - I held it back because it could have interfered with Schwalbe 2021 construction challenge.

Thus: Put a maximal number m of pieces on the board such that the position is legal, no obviously promoted pieces occur (I will be gracious with retro-forced promotions) and each piece has exactly n legal moves (obviously 0<=n<=8).

Remarks:

  • n=0: solution is well known, m=30 is possible.
  • n=1,2: My m=32 can't be beat, try to find it.
  • n=3: This is the "king discipline". Even Rowan will get a headache! (And since I can only accept one answer, I'll prefer to accept that record.)
  • n=4: Note you can't just pile up 16 promotable pawns on both sides as the position would be illegal!
  • n=5,6,7: My m=16 can't be beat (pawns can't occur), try to find it.
  • n=8: This is the other "king discipline". Promotable pawns with a capture object can occur!
  • n>8 is impossible - the kings.

Thus I suggest that you try m=3,4,8 first (I will not reveal my m there).

This is the "opposite" of A mobility puzzle - I held it back because it could have interfered with Schwalbe 2021 construction challenge.

Thus: Put a maximal number m of pieces on the board such that the position is legal, no obviously promoted pieces occur (I will be gracious with retro-forced promotions) and each piece has exactly n legal moves (obviously 0<=n<=8).

Remarks:

  • n=0: solution is well known, m=30 is possible.
  • n=1,2: My m=32 can't be beat, try to find it.
  • n=3: This is the "king discipline". Even Rewan will get a headache! (And since I can only accept one answer, I'll prefer to accept that record.)
  • n=4: Note you can't just pile up 16 promotable pawns on both-)sides as the position would be illegal!
  • n=5,6,7: My m=16 can't be beat (pawns can't occur), try to find it.
  • n=8: This is the other "king discipline". Promotable pawns with a capture object can occur!
  • n>8 is impossible - the kings.

Thus I suggest that you try m=3,4,8 first (I will not reveal my m there).

Source Link
Hauke Reddmann
  • 17.3k
  • 3
  • 32
  • 73
Loading