Timeline for Are there any gambits where I HAVE to decline?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2021 at 18:48 | answer | added | gholm2504 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 3, 2020 at 21:45 | answer | added | Kostya_I | timeline score: 3 | |
| S Dec 3, 2020 at 20:28 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
code formatting should only be used for code, tided up grammar
|
| Dec 3, 2020 at 20:21 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 3, 2020 at 20:28 | |||||
| Dec 3, 2020 at 16:45 | comment | added | Stacker Lee | If there is such a gambit, then it is arguably incorrectly named, as the word implies choice by the original definition. dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/gambit | |
| Dec 3, 2020 at 7:54 | comment | added | YiFan | This does not exactly answer the question, but there are some gambits which you don't have to decline (in the sense of leading to forced mate), but accepting free material leads to a worse position. An example is the Jaenisch Gambit of the Ruy Lopez 3...f5, where 4.exf5 is considered to be a bad move. | |
| Dec 3, 2020 at 6:04 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Dec 3, 2020 at 4:15 | vote | accept | dinosauce33 | ||
| Dec 2, 2020 at 23:01 | answer | added | Acccumulation | timeline score: 52 | |
| Dec 2, 2020 at 22:55 | vote | accept | dinosauce33 | ||
| Dec 3, 2020 at 4:15 | |||||
| Dec 2, 2020 at 22:40 | answer | added | Brian Towers♦ | timeline score: 11 | |
| Dec 2, 2020 at 22:04 | history | asked | dinosauce33 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |