Timeline for How is endgame theory developed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2020 at 2:34 | answer | added | edwina oliver | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 21, 2019 at 3:38 | vote | accept | Remellion | ||
| Aug 14, 2019 at 14:27 | answer | added | Arlen | timeline score: 4 | |
| Aug 6, 2019 at 9:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChess/status/1158664156557578243 | ||
| Aug 2, 2019 at 9:22 | comment | added | Brian Towers♦ | @Remellion I made that change to counter a vote to close on the grounds that the question was unclear and because I thought you made it clear in the body that that was your main intention. I think it is a good question and hope that it remains open. | |
| Aug 2, 2019 at 8:53 | history | edited | Remellion | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Changed title to return to original scope (more than just variant chess theory, but also regular chess theory).
|
| Aug 2, 2019 at 8:51 | comment | added | Remellion | @BrianTowers I don't agree with the title change - I'm not looking only for how to develop atomic theory. I'm also open to learning something about the historical development of regular chess endgame theory, as that might give a clue for what I should do. | |
| Aug 1, 2019 at 13:22 | comment | added | Remellion | @David I'm looking for anything that could help me structure my approach. The development of atomic chess knowledge might mirror regular chess, so I could look to that for clues. (An off-the-cuff analogy: think about what if Stockfish went back to the 1800s and short-circuited chess theory development. We are missing out.) Also Phonon, I don't think it's a duplicate because I'm asking specifically how to study without books, literature, problems or master games to refer to. There are few for atomic, and those I've already been through (and even corrected some errors in prior theory.) | |
| Aug 1, 2019 at 10:59 | comment | added | David | @Remellion What makes you think that the "endgame classification principles" of regular chess apply to Atomic? | |
| Aug 1, 2019 at 10:57 | comment | added | Ellie | Possible duplicate: chess.stackexchange.com/questions/1702/… | |
| Aug 1, 2019 at 10:50 | history | edited | Brian Towers♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Add link for atomic chess
|
| Aug 1, 2019 at 10:35 | review | Close votes | |||
| Aug 1, 2019 at 10:50 | |||||
| Aug 1, 2019 at 10:14 | comment | added | Remellion | I already have access to (6-man) tablebases, as mentioned. I'm asking how to study endgames as a human, generate rules of thumb and principles and classify endgames. | |
| Aug 1, 2019 at 9:56 | comment | added | David | Start with 3-men endgames, then 4-men and so on... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endgame_tablebase | |
| Aug 1, 2019 at 8:38 | history | asked | Remellion | CC BY-SA 4.0 |