Timeline for Punishing player for indicating moves to other team players
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2019 at 17:08 | vote | accept | Croolman | ||
| Feb 7, 2019 at 23:00 | history | edited | D M | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added some explanation on forbidding a move as a possible solution
|
| Feb 7, 2019 at 11:24 | comment | added | D M | On the other hand, you may be correct about that not being in the rules... I'll edit later today. | |
| Feb 7, 2019 at 11:18 | comment | added | D M | According to the preface to the FIDE Laws of Chess: "The Laws assume that arbiters have the necessary competence, sound judgement and absolute objectivity. Too detailed a rule might deprive the arbiter of his freedom of judgement and thus prevent him from finding a solution to a problem dictated by fairness, logic and special factors. FIDE appeals to all chess players and federations to accept this view." | |
| Feb 7, 2019 at 10:57 | comment | added | Annatar | @RemcoGerlich I agree that an arbiter is not allowed to directly forbid a player to make a move. They can interpret the player playing the suggested move as "using advice" though and forfeit the game; and giving the player a friendly warning about this line of thought is appropriate/fair/covered by the rules, even if it leads to the same result as directly forbidding the move. | |
| Feb 7, 2019 at 10:18 | comment | added | RemcoGerlich | This would be up to the competition organisers, not the local arbiter for that particular match. Forbidding a player to make a particular move is not based in the rules, imo. | |
| Feb 6, 2019 at 6:23 | vote | accept | Croolman | ||
| Feb 7, 2019 at 10:23 | |||||
| Feb 6, 2019 at 4:45 | history | answered | D M | CC BY-SA 4.0 |