Chess Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for serious players and enthusiasts of chess. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The below puzzle White to mate in two moves. I tried all combinations. I can't figure it out how to solve this? I am starting to think this as a bug in my mobile application which is showing wrong information that it can be solved in just two moves.

[FEN "2K3Bn/B/3pp1N/1p1P3R/4k/R5q/N1P3Pp/7Q w - - 0 1"]
share|improve this question
There definitely is a checkmate in two moves, although it's not easy to find. – chaosflaws Apr 14 '14 at 15:20
@chaosflaws if there is a way.. I will just froze here in shock. :) – Mr_Green Apr 14 '14 at 15:23
This kind of question can be answered by using an online chessboard editor connected to an engine, for example a link like this (press FORCE COMPUTER TO MOVE)… – user3456 2 days ago
up vote 5 down vote accepted

To be fair, I tried solving this manually.

Qb1 works.

Basic idea - We see that the Black king cannot move. All that is needed is to give it a check. But where to give it a check from? The Black queen guards many key squares like h4, e3, c3, e1. Thus, White should try to find other squares. Qb1 threatens mate with Qb4+.

This is what I calculated -

1...exd5 2. Bxd5#
1...e5 2. Qb4#
1...b4 2. Qxb4#
1...h1=Q 2. Qb4#
1...Qxa3 2. c3!#
1...Qe1 2. Qxe1#
1...Qe3 2. Rxe3#
1...Qb3 2. cxb3#
1...Nxg6 2. Qb4#

I also confirmed with a computer that Qb1 is correct.

share|improve this answer
wow.. yeah.. any suggestions for me to become pro(or atleast beginner)? any book? – Mr_Green Apr 14 '14 at 15:30
@Mr_Green, see my suggestions here -… – Wes Apr 14 '14 at 15:36
My first suggestion would be to stop looking at puzzles like this immediately. They are designed only for complexity/artistry/presentability. The chance of a position anything like this occurring in a real game is close to nonexistant, you're much better off looking at puzzles that present more likely/real situations. – GrizzlyRawrz Apr 14 '14 at 15:37
@GrizzyRawrz I used to think the same way, but my mom once bought me a 200 chess problems book (all mates in 2 and complex positions which wouldn't occur in real life). I noticed that after attempting to solve them, my tactical ability was greatly sharpened, even for the "regular" puzzles. – Wes Apr 14 '14 at 15:38
Thank you guys for your suggestions :) – Mr_Green Apr 14 '14 at 15:43

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.