As white, I often encounter the Philidor defense by black:
[FEN ""]
1. e4 e5
2. Nf3 d6
I usually play Nc3 or d4 on the next move, but is this the best move? What are some lines (advantages or disadvantages) against the Philidor?
|
As white, I often encounter the Philidor defense by black:
I usually play |
||||
|
Fred Reinfeld suggests the following line (exclamation marks are his) as in this game. White maintains a sharp edge:
A good resource to study would be shredderchess.com's opening database. |
|||||||||||
|
|
Against the Philidor you might experiment with a line I developed myself (don't know how good it is), but if they surrender the center (i.e. exd4), then I develop a setup where I fianchetto the dark-squared bishop on b2, play f3 at some early point (with perhaps a later f4). I usually stick the other bishop on d3 then if they chop it with a knight I take back with the c-pawn, getting a better center than Black at the cost of bishop vs. knight. I usually can start up some sort of middlegame kingside pawn majority attack as a result of all this and create mate threats by Qe1-g3 along with the bishop at b2. It seems to work fairly well but I'm sure some IM/GM could refute the whole thing. Not like we regularly play against those guys though. :) |
|||
|
|
2. ... Nc6Sorry! – Daniel δ♦ May 17 '12 at 14:11