Take the 2-minute tour ×
Chess Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for serious players and enthusiasts of chess. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Go to any online chess server, there are thousands playing and trying their best. These days there are even online coaches and titled players and people are ready to shed huge bucks for getting couple of hours sessions.

But given all this, i sometimes think: Why do people want to become a chess grandmaster or a titled player? What do i really get out of that - a high paid job? NO - a green card to US? - NO - free sponsorship ? PROBABLY NO - huge money? - NO (because once you become GM you have to compete with others similar to you)

Then why? why is there a craze to become a chess grandmaster, or a titled player?

If anyone has a good answer and a accurate ones, please reply with good points.

share|improve this question
5  
Voting to leave open : it describes a psychological phenomenon common to chess players. I'm not saying the answer has anything to do with chess, I'm saying 1. there is an answer and 2. it's interesting to chess players. –  Nikana Reklawyks Jan 14 '13 at 0:05
1  
+1 for asking a question I always wanted to ask but didn't, I thought they might vote it down and close it :) –  Lynob Jul 8 '14 at 17:49

6 Answers 6

up vote 9 down vote accepted

I think it has to do with just having the title "Grand Master". Would I like to be a Grand Master? YES, but it probably would never happen in a million years. Unless you are probably in the top 10, you probably won't make a living out of it. I would suspect that those who don't make a living out of it, but still highly rated and play in international tournaments might have secondary jobs, but in the end, it is not about the money, it is about having fun.

share|improve this answer
2  
kudos to you for this: ` it is not about the money, it is about having fun.` upvote to you. But the strange thing is, people put so much effort just to have fun? Memorizing openings, reading books, spending hours analyzing, wasting money etc. If the same effort would have been spent elsewhere, i guess they would have raised their standard of living for sure. –  kingsmasher1 Jan 14 '13 at 5:54
4  
@kingsmasher1, "If the same effort would have been spent elsewhere, i guess they would have raised their standard of living for sure." I think many feel that the effort involved in chess is rewarding enough in itself for it to have raised their standard of living in another sense entirely. You could say of any hobby or pastime (or vacation, or sleeping, or parents playing with their kids) that one's time could have instead been spent working on making more money. To each his own. –  ETD Jan 14 '13 at 10:36
    
@EdDean: "any hobby or pastime (or vacation, or sleeping, or parents playing with their kids)" no doubt these are hobby and good pastime too, but these just takes couple of hours or a month at max for a vacation, but does not take prolonged practice, concentration or study as chess. For people who are not into much of brain related work like clerks, or store-workers chess may help to keep sharpen their wits, but for people who are into software jobs, they should look at alternate hobbies which may relax their minds rather than strain, again it is individual choice and opinions can differ. –  kingsmasher1 Jan 14 '13 at 11:44
2  
@kingsmasher1, my point wasn't actually about any one of the things I mentioned. My point was that one could just as easily say what you're saying about chess, about any use of one's free time, and so about the sum total of one's free time. That is, the point you seem to be trying to make about chess would just as well extend to all the rest of one's leisure activities that take time, leading to the conclusion that any use of free time in a way that doesn't have a direct impact on one's job skills is somehow strange or perplexing. But it's not, of course, and the same goes for chess. –  ETD Jan 14 '13 at 22:32
1  
@kingsmasher1 I totally agree that chess seems a waste of time, sometime, but for me, I'd rather waste my time in chess rather than fb or xbox or tv :) it's just like defeating someone in counter strike or red alert, difference is, chess is better for your brain. But I do agree with every point you made –  Lynob Jul 8 '14 at 17:58

Napoleon put it succinctly: A soldier will fight long and hard for a bit of colored ribbon.

Just a couple of points:

It is the same reason that students love getting "gold stars," and why there are so many badges on StackExchange itself. There have been volumes written on the power of peer recognition.

In particular, chess titles (for the most part) are a direct result of chess achievement. FM, IM and GM titles are all well-earned. No matter how much we might not care for a person, we know that if they have a chess title, they earned it. A GM title is the highest formal title, and it serves to inform your peers (and often yourself) that a certain level of expertise was attained.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 for accomplishment, and proof, of expertise. OP, keep in mind that's not something money can buy. –  Nikana Reklawyks Jan 14 '13 at 0:06
    
I think a major reason is, people think putting brains in chess in turn would help them to sharpen their wits at their practical work, but alas most of them end up neglecting the later and giving more effort in their chess development only. –  kingsmasher1 Jan 14 '13 at 5:59
    
+1 for Napoleon! –  Lynob Jul 8 '14 at 17:48

The answer has to do with our human psychology. There is a book written by Daniel Pink, titled "Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us", where he finds that people are NOT motivated by these things:

  1. Rewards
  2. Avoiding punishments

And he concludes that people ARE motivated by these things:

  1. Autonomy - Being able to do what you want
  2. Mastery - Getting better at stuff, it's satisfying!
  3. Purpose - Making a difference in the world

He says the research shows that for physical tasks, rewards and punishments can be effective. However, for tasks that require even a small amount of mental effort, bigger rewards actually lead to worse results.

The reason people spend huge amounts of time studying chess, and huge amounts of money on chess, with no hope of ever making any money from chess, is the same reason that people play musical instruments for fun: Because mastery is satisfying. That's it.

Here is a 10-minute video of the author's explanation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc

share|improve this answer
    
+1 for the general point of view, broader than chess alone! –  Maxwell86 Jul 7 at 9:18

Just to expand Ram's point a little bit, and speculate as to why there is such a craze now as opposed to the past.

I suspect the modern craze is in part a result of Elo ratings, and pseudo Elo ratings online.

Modern computer game design is very carefully constructed to ensure that:

  • At any point the game is challenging, but not too hard
  • The player gets instant feedback on their success and progress

Such ideas are now spreading into other areas, and it is often referred to as "gamification", such as on stack exchange getting immediate feedback from votes etc.

Chess is already a game, but the Elo system makes learning chess a game in itself. You can always play someone very close to you in ability, and you can always see the tiny steps of progress towards grand master.

I suspect many who make GM did not set out to become GM, but simply to become better chess players, to reach the next rung and see how good they can get... If a learning curve is pitched just right it can be extremely addictive.

share|improve this answer

Isn't there a lot of ego involved in this, the desire for prestige and to show others that you're their superior? It can't be for the money, since even now with the big reward tournaments only a small percentage can live well on their earnings. The others will also have to teach or publish, and for the time, effort and expense one has to put into reaching that level, assuming they have sufficient talent to do so, the tangible rewards hardly seem worth the effort.

I had the desire to become really good when I started playing, but it became hard work and took all of the joy out of it. I ultimately decided it wasn't worth it, so now I just play for fun with less stress and probably just as good results. But I no longer agonize over possibly losing. It is after all just a game.

share|improve this answer
1  
Maybe you'll want to format the answer. I can't really read the current format. Also, who said it? –  Student T Jul 7 at 3:38
    
Not sure what you mean by formatting or how to do it. Have just started posting on his site. I didn't use anyone else's quotes, just my own thoughts based on my 65 year involvement with chess.. –  CConero Jul 8 at 13:15
    
Well, if you look at your own answer, can you see it without scrolling the text left and right? If you need scrolling, I also need to scroll. It makes me harder to read and understand what you wanted to say. People usually only highlight the text like what you did when it was a quote. –  Student T Jul 9 at 0:57
    
I asked you how to avoid the scrolling and all you did was just criticize me and cost me credits. How about being helpful and telling me how to get out of the scrolling instead, since I obviously don't know how to do it myself. I tried to do so on another answer too and wasn't able to. Is there a tutorial for that on here somewhere? And I don't know how one highlights text either. I didn't do that on purpose. Can't you see that I'm new at using this and need help doing so. Criticizing me isn't helping. . –  CConero Jul 9 at 1:48
    
I didn't down-vote you. It wasn't me who did that. I was simply helping you by giving you a feedback. @ETD has already edited the post it for you. Please take a look how he did it. –  Student T Jul 9 at 1:50

"What do i really get out of that - a high paid job? NO - a green card to US? - NO - free sponsorship ? PROBABLY NO - huge money? - NO (because once you become GM you have to compete with others similar to you)" There is a craze of becoming GRANDMASTER because : 1.You can get a high paid job 2.You can get a green card to US 3.You get free and good sponsorship 4.You can also get huge money through coaching ,prize winnings, appearance fees. e.t.c. (really)

share|improve this answer
3  
Down voted because the answer has no research to back up the assertions. Can you include research into earning potential by ELO? How can a GM get a green card to the US? –  Bad_Bishop Mar 24 at 16:35

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.